Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 233/09 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court allows social security claim for Polish resident performing cross-border services in Poland.

Case Number II UK 233/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Polish Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's dismissal of a social security claim by a Polish entrepreneur performing maritime services across multiple EU member states. The court found that the appellant, residing in Poland, was entitled to Polish social security coverage because he executed part of his business activities within Poland, even if the work was performed on ships in other countries. The decision relied on the principle that partial performance of activities in Poland triggers the application of Polish social security legislation, preventing the loss of benefits due to dual coverage.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 6 ust. 5, 13 ust. 4 of the Social Security System Act; Art. 14a ust. 2, 14b of Regulation 1408/71: A self-employed person residing in one Member State and performing activities in more than two Member States is subject to the social security legislation of the state where part of the activities are performed.

Keywords

AI generated
social security coverage cross-border services self-employed persons Regulation 1408/71 multiple member states place of performance residence requirement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 6 ust. 5 i 13 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 14a ust. 2 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) Nr 1408/71
art. 14b ust. 4 rozporządzenia Rady (EWG) Nr 1408/71
art. 25 k.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c
art. 39816 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok ETS z dnia 20 września 1994 r. w sprawie C-12/93, Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging przeciwko A. Drake
wyrok z dnia 26 maja 2005 r. w sprawie C-249/04, José Allard
wyrok z dnia 10 czerwca 1986 r., w sprawie 60/85, M. E. S. Luijten przeciwko Raad Van Arbeid
wyrok z dnia 3 maja 1990 r. w sprawie C-2/89, Kits von Heijningen
wyrok z dnia 16 lutego 1995 r., w sprawie C-425/93, Calle Grenzshop Andresen GmbH & Co. KG przeciwko Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse für den Kreis Schleswig-Flensburg
II UK 99/09
Supreme Court ruled that simultaneous work in multiple EU countries for one employer triggers social security liability under Regulation 1408/71.
I UK 289/05
Social security law: waiting for orders does not equal temporary cessation of business activity.
I UK 208/07
Social security court dismisses appeal; business activity interruptions do not negate insurance obligation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text