III UK 100/08
AI generated
Social security appeal dismissed due to res judicata, but cassation allowed for new factual basis.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the insured's appeal based on res judicata. The lower court incorrectly applied the rule because the new pension application relied on different factual grounds than the previously finalized case. Consequently, the appeal was allowed to proceed on its merits rather than being barred by the prior judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 83 ust. 2 ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych: The principle of res judicata does not bar a new administrative decision if the applicant submits a new request based on distinct factual circumstances not addressed in the prior final judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
res judicata
social security appeal
new factual basis
pension entitlement
administrative reconsideration
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
art. 83 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 13 października 1998 r. o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 398 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
art. 39815 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII UZP 18/96
Social security court allows re-evaluation of farmer pension rights under old law after new evidence submitted post-act change.
II UZP 7/78
II URN 131/83
II URN 182/86
II UKN 50/96
Social security pension review requires special statute over civil code; error in insurance period does not bar retrial.
II UKN 231/99
Final judgment bars re-litigation of social security benefits unless new evidence or circumstances exist.
I UK 11/05
Final war invalidity ruling does not bar new pension claims if medical conditions have changed since the original decision.