Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 231/99 AI generated

Final judgment bars re-litigation of social security benefits unless new evidence or circumstances exist.

Case Number II UKN 231/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, upholding the final judgment that barred a new claim for disability benefits. The applicant sought to reopen proceedings after a medical commission reassessed her disability status, arguing the lower court failed to address her current health condition. The court ruled that the principle of res judicata precluded re-litigation without new evidence or circumstances, and the appeal lacked sufficient legal grounds to challenge the administrative decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 80 ust. 1 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 227 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: A final judgment establishing the lack of entitlement to social security benefits precludes re-litigation of the same claim unless new evidence or circumstances exist that could have influenced the original decision.

Keywords

AI generated
res judicata principle social security benefits disability assessment final judgment effect cassation appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 80 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 227 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
§ 5 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 20 czerwca 1983 r.
art. 45 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
uchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 20 września 1978 r., II UZP 7/78
postanowienie z dnia 19 stycznia 1984 r., II URN 131/83
wyrok z dnia 8 października 1986 r., II URN 182/86
postanowienie z dnia 14 stycznia 1997 r., II UKN 50/96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text