I PK 6/09
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes labor dispute verdict for failing to verify if a restructuring plan constitutes binding labor law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim for a severance payment based on a restructuring plan. The defendant argued the plan was merely an internal agreement regarding job changes rather than a source of labor law. The court ruled that the lower court failed to determine whether the plan met the criteria of Article 9 of the Labor Code to be considered binding labor law, a prerequisite for any substantive review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 87, 91 Konstytucji RP; Art. 9 § 1 k.p.: In labor disputes, a court must evaluate whether an act not in the general legal catalog constitutes binding labor law; if not, the case is dismissed for lack of legal basis.
Keywords
AI generated
labor law source
restructuring plan
binding agreement
severance payment
labor code criteria
casation violation
material law basis
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 87 Konstytucji RP
Art. 91 Konstytucji RP
Art. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3981 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3982 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 9 § 1 k.p