Social package employment guarantee deemed contrary to social coexistence rules in privatization context.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to reinstate employment based on a social package signed during state enterprise privatization. The court found that while the social package claimed to be a source of labor law, its binding nature was not established by the parties' intent or statutory incorporation. Consequently, the court ruled that the package's provisions could not override the general principle of social coexistence in this specific privatization scenario.