I UK 209/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding pension denial based on prior final judgment. The court rules that a final judgment on work incapacity binds the court regarding the period up to the verdict. The court held that the principle of res judicata prevents re-evaluating the same facts without statutory grounds for retrial.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the insured's cassation appeal against a final judgment denying a work incapacity pension. The insured argued that his disability stemmed from permanent impairment, but the court noted that a prior final judgment had already assessed his work incapacity as absent. The court ruled that the principle of res judicata binds the court to the previous assessment of facts up to the date of the verdict, making further examination of the same conditions inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 366 k.p.c.; Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.: A final judgment on work incapacity binds the court regarding the period up to the verdict, preventing re-evaluation of the same facts without statutory grounds for retrial.
Keywords
AI generated
res judicata principle
work incapacity pension
final judgment binding
cassation appeal dismissal
prior court assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 366 k.p.c.
Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 57 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 316 k.p.c.
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji
Art. 176 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 232 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII UK 139/02
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when new evidence is not presented to reopen a final pension denial decision.
II UK 395/03
Social court dismissed appeal; pension eligibility conditions must be met at the time of the decision.
I UK 93/04
Social security pension right upheld if continuous disability existed despite decision date evidence gaps.
II UK 61/05
Supreme Court allows pension claim review when new medical evidence changes factual basis despite prior final judgment.