Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UK 209/08 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding pension denial based on prior final judgment. The court rules that a final judgment on work incapacity binds the court regarding the period up to the verdict. The court held that the principle of res judicata prevents re-evaluating the same facts without statutory grounds for retrial.

Case Number I UK 209/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the insured's cassation appeal against a final judgment denying a work incapacity pension. The insured argued that his disability stemmed from permanent impairment, but the court noted that a prior final judgment had already assessed his work incapacity as absent. The court ruled that the principle of res judicata binds the court to the previous assessment of facts up to the date of the verdict, making further examination of the same conditions inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 366 k.p.c.; Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.: A final judgment on work incapacity binds the court regarding the period up to the verdict, preventing re-evaluation of the same facts without statutory grounds for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
res judicata principle work incapacity pension final judgment binding cassation appeal dismissal prior court assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 366 k.p.c.
Art. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 57 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 316 k.p.c.
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji
Art. 176 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 232 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text