Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZP 2/08 AI generated

Supreme Court allows termination during pregnancy without union consent but dismisses compensation question as unnecessary.

Case Number II PZP 2/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that terminating an employee's contract without notice during pregnancy is permissible if no trade union exists or does not represent the employee. The lower court had asked two legal questions regarding this termination and potential compensation under Article 60 of the Labor Code. The Supreme Court answered the first question affirmatively but refused to answer the second, deeming it unnecessary since the legality of the termination was already established.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 177 § 1 k.p.; Art. 60 k.p.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 61 § 1 ust. Sąd Najwyższy: When a trade union does not exist or does not represent the employee, termination without notice during pregnancy is admissible, but questions regarding compensation under Art. 60 k.p. are inadmissible if the legality of the termination is already determined by the first question.

Keywords

AI generated
termination without notice pregnancy protection trade union representation labor code provisions legal question admissibility Supreme Court ruling employee compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 177 § 1 k.p.
Art. 60 k.p.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 61 § 1 ust. ustawy z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 177 § 1 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 177 k.p
art. 56 § 1 k.p
art. 58 k.p
art. 60 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text