Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PK 44/05 AI generated

Supreme Court clarifies that invalid termination during notice period requires re-evaluation of employee claims.

Case Number III PK 44/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the employee's appeal regarding wrongful termination. The employee sought damages for an illegal dismissal occurring during the statutory notice period, while the employer argued for specific calculation rules. The court ruled that an invalid termination during the notice period mandates a review of all employee claims and established that double compensation for the same loss is prohibited.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 60 k.p.; Art. 45 k.p.; Art. 471 k.p.; Art. 56 k.p.: When an employer terminates a contract without notice during the notice period, the court must review the employee's claims, but the employee may choose between damages under Art. 471 or Art. 60 k.p. to avoid double compensation for the same loss.

Keywords

AI generated
wrongful termination notice period double compensation employee damages contract dissolution statutory notice remedies selection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 60 k.p.
Art. 45 k.p.
Art. 471 k.p.
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 393 k.p.c.
art. 60 k.p
art. 52 § 2 k.p
art. 52 § 3 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 53 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text