Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 56/07 AI generated

Supreme Court allows damages claim for non-attendance when employment contract termination period extends beyond actual start date.

Case Number II PK 56/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's dismissal of a damages claim for an employee's failure to start work. The employee had signed a contract with a six-month notice period but did not begin employment as scheduled. The court ruled that the statutory termination period applies even if the employee never started, provided the contract was validly concluded. Consequently, the employer's early termination without notice was deemed lawful, and the employee remained liable for damages under the agreed terms.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 k.p.; Art. 36 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.; Art. 49 k.p.: The establishment of an employment relationship is not dependent on the actual commencement of work, and the statutory notice period applies to termination even if the employee fails to start, unless the employee was previously employed by the same employer or the parties extended the notice period.

Keywords

AI generated
employment contract formation notice period calculation damages for non-attendance termination without notice actual commencement of work

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 26 k.p.
Art. 36 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.
Art. 49 k.p.
Art. 32 § 2 k.p.
Art. 30 § 21 k.p.
Art. 114 k.p.
Art. 115 k.p.
Art. 187 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 321 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 15 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text