Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 3/07 AI generated

Social Security Court rejects verification committee protocol as ground for pension recalculation. The court held that such protocols cannot trigger a new procedure to adjust pension amounts. The decision clarifies that only employment contracts and attendance records determine mining work duration. The court ruled that verification protocols lack legal standing for pension adjustments. The judgment emphasizes strict adherence to statutory procedures for pension recalculations. The court found the protocol insufficient to justify a new pension determination. The decision establishes that administrative protocols do not override statutory evidence requirements. The court dismissed the request to reopen proceedings based on the protocol. The ruling clarifies the evidentiary standards for mining work pension calculations. The judgment confirms that verification protocols are not valid for pension adjustments.

Case Number II UZP 3/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Social Security Court dismissed the applicant's request to reopen proceedings to recalculate his mining pension based on a verification committee protocol. The applicant argued that the protocol should have been used to adjust his pension, while the Social Security Institution relied on it to deny the adjustment. The court ruled that the verification protocol lacks legal standing as a basis for reopening proceedings or altering pension amounts. Consequently, the court determined that only employment contracts and attendance records serve as valid evidence for establishing mining work duration.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Protokół komisji weryfikacyjnej działającej na podstawie rozporządzenia Ministra Gospodarki, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 6 lutego 2004 r. w sprawie ewidencjonowania przez pracodawców okresów zatrudnienia na stanowiskach, na których okresy pracy górniczej zalicza się w wymiarze półtorakrotnym przy ustalania prawa do górniczej emerytury oraz na niektórych innych stanowiskach pracy górniczej; protokół ten nie może stanowić przesłanki do wznowienia postępowania w celu ponownego ustalenia wysokości świadczenia w trybie art. 114 ust. 1a ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych.

Keywords

AI generated
verification committee protocol pension recalculation procedure mining work duration social security benefits reopening proceedings grounds employment contract evidence attendance records validity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 51 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z FUS
art. 114 ust. 1a ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z FUS
art. 36 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy FUS
rozporządzenie Ministra Gospodarki, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 6 lutego 2004 r. w sprawie ewidencjonowania przez pracodawców okresów zatrudnienia na stanowiskach
art. 149 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text