Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III UK 31/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation against pension decision where procedural errors did not affect the outcome.

Case Number III UK 31/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Irena M.-S. against a Social Insurance Office decision denying early retirement benefits due to childcare. The lower courts found that the applicant's son did not require constant care, contrary to the initial medical certificate. Although the Social Insurance Office failed to formally notify the applicant of the procedure restart, the Court held this defect did not influence the final decision's substance.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 114 ust. 1 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych; Art. 149 k.p.a.: A failure to formally notify a party of a procedure restart does not constitute a ground for invalidating the resulting decision if the procedural defect did not affect the outcome of the case.

Keywords

AI generated
early retirement benefits procedure restart formal notification defect substantive outcome cassation appeal social insurance law childcare support

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 114 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
Art. 149 k.p.a.
Art. 141 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 149 k.p
art. 145 § 1 pkt 5 k.p
art. 149 § 1 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 145 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 151 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text