Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 280/06 AI generated

Supreme Court allows extending disability pension claims in appeal proceedings beyond the original decision date.

Case Number II UK 280/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation complaint against an appellate court judgment that extended a disability pension to a later period. The applicant argued that the appeal court violated procedural rules by granting benefits for a time after the original administrative decision, while the opposing party contended that such extensions were legally impermissible. The court ruled that while the general principle requires judging based on facts at the time of the original decision, specific social insurance laws permit expanding claims for recurring benefits in appeal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 383 k.p.c.; Art. 47714 § 4 k.p.c.: In proceedings regarding recurring social insurance benefits, the appellate court may extend the claim to cover periods subsequent to the original administrative decision, and the procedural rule limiting appeals to the original facts does not apply to such extensions.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension extension recurring benefits claim appellate procedure rules social insurance law cassation complaint dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 47714 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 3981 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 47714 § 4 k.p.c
art. 316 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 316 § 1 k.p.c
art. 391 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text