Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 124/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal as alleged procedural defects did not affect plaintiff's rights.

Case Number I PK 124/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against the labor court's rejection of her wage claim. The plaintiff argued that the employer's unauthorized representation by its president violated procedural rules regarding the opposing party's interests. The court ruled that such alleged defects did not impact the plaintiff's rights and that no special circumstances justified the Supreme Court conducting evidence on its own.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 232 ust. 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal based on procedural violations affecting the opposing party is admissible only if the defect rendered the proceedings void, and the Supreme Court may conduct evidence only in exceptional cases where the defect actually impaired the appellant's rights.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal procedural defects labor law representation evidence on its own opposing party rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 232 ust. 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 31 § 1 k.p.
art. 68 k.p
art. 87 § 2 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 87 § 1 k.p.c
art. 386 § 2 k.p.c
art. 89 § 1 k.p.c
art. 126 § 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text