Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 44/06 AI generated

Notifying an employee about pension rights during notice period does not equate to mutual termination agreement.

Case Number II PK 44/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a teacher seeking reinstatement after her employer terminated her contract for organizational reasons. The employer had notified the teacher of her pension eligibility during the notice period, but the court found no evidence of a mutual agreement to terminate the contract. The court ruled that such notification does not constitute a withdrawal of the employer's unilateral termination, and the lower court correctly applied the relevant statute.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 20 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 23 ust. 4 pkt 1 Karty Nauczyciela: Notifying an employee of pension rights during the notice period does not equate to a mutual termination agreement.

Keywords

AI generated
Karta Nauczyciela wypowiedzenie umowy porozumienie stron przywrócenie do pracy emerytura rozwiązanie umowy skarga kasacyjna

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
art. 20 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
art. 23 ust. 4 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela
art. 8 k.p.
art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text