I BP 1/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming unfairness for choosing one valid legal interpretation over another.

Case Number I BP 1/06

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2006-07-24

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Ombudsman's complaint regarding a final labor court judgment. The appellant argued the lower court erred by selecting a specific legal interpretation of the law, which they claimed was incorrect. The Court ruled that choosing between multiple valid interpretations of a statute does not constitute a violation of law requiring compensation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; art. 417 § 1 i art. 4171 § 2 k.c.: A court decision based on a legal provision allowing for multiple valid interpretations is not considered inconsistent with the law, even if the chosen interpretation is later deemed incorrect.

Keywords

AI generated

interpretation of law violation of law compensation claim final judgment labor dispute legal uncertainty supreme court

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.

art. 417 § 1 k.c.

art. 4171 § 2 k.c.

art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c

art. 4171 § 2 k.c

art. 51 k.p

art. 51 § 1 k.p

art. 51 § 2 k.p

art. 47 § 1 k.p

art. 56 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-compliance with law regarding late statute of limitations objection.

Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.

Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming illegal dismissal, ruling it cannot be used merely to seek compensation for any flawed judgment.

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; factual findings and legal characterization of transport contract were not erroneous.

Sygn. akt V CNP 68/05 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 marca 2006 r. Sąd Najwyższy w składzie : SSN Lech Walentynowicz (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca) SSN Elżbieta Skowrońska-Bocian SSN Marek Sychowicz w sprawie ze skargi Przedsiębiorstwa "B." W.M., K.M. Spółki Jawnej o stwierdzenie niezgodności z prawem prawomocnego postanowienia Sądu Apelacyjnego z dnia 25 lipca 2005 r., sygn. akt [...] w sprawie z powództwa Przedsiębiorstwa "E." J.K., J.P. Spółki Jawnej przeciwko: J.G., Zakładowi "Z." Spółce z o.o., Przedsiębiorstwu "B." W.M., K.M. Spółce Jawnej, Przedsiębiorstwu "Z." Spółce z o.o. oraz "S." S.A. o ustalenie, po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 marca 2006 r., oddala skargę.

Employee restored by court order does not earn vacation leave rights for the period of forced unemployment.

Full text