Supreme Court dismissed appeal claiming final judgment violated law due to ambiguous regulation interpretation.

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant hospital's appeal challenging a final labor court judgment awarding seniority pay to a nurse. The lower court applied more favorable rules to the plaintiff because the hospital's internal regulation improperly excluded her prior work experience, violating equal treatment principles. The Supreme Court held that when a regulation can be reasonably interpreted in multiple ways, a final judgment based on one valid interpretation cannot be deemed legally inconsistent.