Court dismissed appeal ruling that executive severance is compensation for job loss, not work pay.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment that rejected his claim for executive severance. The plaintiff argued that the contractually agreed severance should be treated as compensation for job loss rather than remuneration for work, citing specific clauses in his employment contract. The court rejected this distinction, holding that the severance was a specific contractual benefit for losing the executive position, not wages for labor performed, and thus the lower court's decision was legally sound.