Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 592/01 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation, allowing employer's contractual severance pay clause despite 'payment for no work' argument.

Case Number I PKN 592/01
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the employer against a labor court judgment awarding severance pay to the former CEO. The court held that a contractual clause granting severance upon termination by the employer does not violate public policy, even if the employee performed no work. The decision emphasizes that such clauses are valid market standards for corporate officers and do not constitute unjust enrichment or a breach of the principle of equivalence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 58 § 2 k.c.; Art. 13 k.p.; Art. 197 k.h.; Art. 367 k.h.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: A contractual provision granting severance pay upon termination by the employer does not violate public policy or the principle of equivalence, as it represents a voluntary agreement acceptable in the market economy for corporate officers.

Keywords

AI generated
severance pay termination by employer public policy equivalence principle corporate officer labor contract cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 58 § 2 k.c.
Art. 13 k.p.
Art. 197 k.h.
Art. 367 k.h.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 300 k.p
art. 9 k.p
art. 80 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text