I UK 168/05
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where pregnant woman's employment contract to claim sickness benefits violates social coexistence rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that declared the employment contract void. The appellant, a pregnant woman running a business, signed a full-time contract to access higher sickness benefits while continuing her voluntary insurance. The court found this arrangement contrary to social coexistence principles because its sole purpose was to evade social security laws and extract unjustified benefits.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 58 § 2 and 3 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; A contract concluded to evade statutory obligations or obtain unjustified benefits violates social coexistence rules and is void.
Keywords
AI generated
social coexistence rules
void legal act
fraudulent employment
sickness benefits fraud
pregnant employee
social security evasion
unjust enrichment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 58 § 2 k.c.
Art. 58 § 3 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
art. 300 k.p
art. 58 § 1 k.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c