Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III BP 3/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed judge's claim that salary for sick leave violated equality and social security rights.

Case Number III BP 3/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Renata D.'s complaint regarding a salary difference for her sick leave compared to other employees. The lower court ruled that Article 94 of the Common Courts Organization Act requires uniform treatment for sick leave regardless of the employment status. The Supreme Court upheld this, stating the statutory provision ensures judges receive compensation for illness without violating constitutional equality or social security guarantees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 94 § 1 ust. 1 Prawa o ustroju sądów powszechnych; Art. 67 Konstytucji RP: The statutory provision granting judges compensation for illness does not violate the constitutional principle of equality or social security rights, as it constitutes a specific remuneration system justified by the distinct status of judges.

Keywords

AI generated
judges salary sick leave compensation equality principle social security rights Common Courts Organization Act remuneration system constitutional guarantee

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 94 § 1 ust. 1 Prawa o ustroju sądów powszechnych
Art. 67 Konstytucji RP
art. 67 Konstytucji RP
art. 92 k.p
art. 32 Konstytucji
art. 8 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 67 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III ZP 16/99
Retired judge retains veteran allowance and energy allowance rights despite receiving judicial salary instead of disability pension.
III UZP 5/02
Supreme Court rules judges are entitled to one-time accident compensation paid by Social Insurance Fund.
II UZP 1/04
Retired judge's contract work falls under mandatory social insurance despite constitutional retirement status.
I UK 300/04
Supreme Court dismisses cassation, ruling early pension privileges for workers do not violate equality.
II UKN 270/99
II UK 77/02
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against early retirement regulation limiting it to employees only.
I UK 142/04
Social Security Court denies early retirement for cooperative member driver, ruling statutory limits comply with equality principle.
II UK 136/04
II PK 29/04
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; civil contracts do not automatically convert to employment relationships despite factual work performance.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text