Supreme Court dismissed cassation; civil contracts do not automatically convert to employment relationships despite factual work performance.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a lower court's decision to reject his claim for employment status and wage equalization. The plaintiff argued that his factual performance of duties should override the written civil contracts, while the defendant contended the contracts were valid and distinct from employment relationships. The court ruled that the existence of a civil contract does not automatically transform into an employment relationship merely because work was performed, and no legal provision supports the automatic conversion of invalid civil contracts into valid employment contracts.