Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III KRS 4/05 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses judge's appeal against KRS refusal to extend service after age 65 due to lack of response to negative opinion.

Case Number III KRS 4/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Judge Antoni R.'s appeal against the National Council of the Judiciary's (KRS) refusal to extend his judicial service beyond age 65. The KRS denied the request based on a negative performance opinion from the District Court Collegium, which Judge R. failed to comment on despite being explicitly invited to do so. The court ruled that the KRS did not violate procedural rules because the judge voluntarily chose not to respond to the opinion, making the refusal lawful.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa; art. 69 § 1 Prawa o ustroju sądów powszechnych: The National Council of the Judiciary is not obligated to hold a direct hearing if the judge fails to respond to a negative opinion, provided they had the opportunity to do so.

Keywords

AI generated
judicial service extension age 65 retirement National Council of Judiciary performance opinion procedural opportunity dismissal of appeal judicial independence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. o Krajowej Radzie Sądownictwa
art. 69 § 1 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. - Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
§ 19 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Prezydenta RP z dnia 22 grudnia 2001 r. w sprawie szczegółowego trybu działania Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa
§ 20 ust. 2 rozporządzenia Prezydenta RP z dnia 22 grudnia 2001 r. w sprawie szczegółowego trybu działania Krajowej Rady Sądownictwa

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text