Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZ 20/05 AI generated

Appeal filed during lawyer's illness is allowed if illness justified delay and remedy was timely requested.

Case Number II PZ 20/05
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside the lower court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal, which had been filed after the deadline due to the lawyer's illness. The appellant argued that the lawyer's sickness prevented timely filing, while the lower court held that the appeal was submitted too late despite the illness. The court ruled that a lawyer's illness justifying a delay cannot be used to the client's detriment if the request for time extension was made promptly after recovery.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.: If a party's failure to perform a procedural act within the time limit is not due to their fault, the court shall restore the time limit upon request; however, the act performed during the fault-causing circumstance cannot be detrimental to the party if the request for restoration was made with due diligence.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural time limit restoration of time lawyer's illness due diligence standard fault in procedure appeal filing civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 169 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 169 § 1 k.p.c
art. 168 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text