Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 228/04 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; collective agreement not labor law source or third-party performance contract.

Case Number I PK 228/04
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that rejected the plaintiff's claim for compensation. The plaintiff, a former manager, sought damages based on a collective agreement between trade unions and a strategic investor, arguing it functioned as a source of labor law or a contract for third-party performance. The court held that the agreement was merely a source of mutual obligations between the signatories and did not create direct rights for employees against the employer, nor did it constitute a labor law source or a third-party performance contract under the cited statutes.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 9 § 1 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.c.; A collective agreement between trade unions and a strategic investor is not a source of labor law nor a contract for third-party performance, as it creates only mutual obligations between the signatories without establishing direct rights for employees against the employer.

Keywords

AI generated
collective agreement source of labor law third party performance cassation appeal employee rights trade union strategic investor

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 9 § 1 k.p.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.c.
Art. 4771 k.p.c.
Art. 39312 k.p.c.
art. 9 k.p
art. 393 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 9 § 1 k.p
art. 393 § 1 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text