Employer's error regarding employee access to confidential info does not invalidate non-compete agreement damages.

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's cassation appeal, upholding the lower court's award of damages for the employee's adherence to a non-compete agreement. The employer argued that the employee lacked access to confidential information, which should have justified terminating the post-employment non-compete clause. The court ruled that the absence of such justification does not automatically terminate the contract but requires a mutual agreement or specific legal procedure, meaning the agreed damages remained enforceable.