I PK 558/02
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses cassation as no general legal issue exists regarding general clauses in labor law.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court refused to admit the cassation appeal to review, ruling that the case lacked a general legal issue requiring interpretation. The appellant argued that general clauses in labor law regarding fair remuneration were violated, while the respondent contended the specific facts did not warrant a broad legal ruling. The court decided that applying such clauses depends on individual circumstances, meaning the question could not serve as a general legal precedent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal must be admitted only if it raises a general legal issue; if the application of general clauses depends on specific case circumstances, the appeal is inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility
general legal issue requirement
general clauses labor law
fair remuneration standards
individual case circumstances
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c
art. 58 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 393 k.p.c
art. 393 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3937 § 1 k.p.c