I PKN 590/01
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; a post-appointment letter cannot be a false document basis for dismissal under Higher Education Act.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the university against a teacher's dismissal. The court found that the teacher's written declaration, submitted two years after his appointment, could not constitute a 'false document' serving as the basis for that appointment. Consequently, the statutory requirement for a false document to terminate the employment contract was not met. The court ruled that the university's autonomy does not justify expanding the definition of false documents to include post-facto declarations.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 95 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o szkolnictwie wyższym; A written statement made after an appointment cannot be considered a false document serving as the basis for that appointment under the Higher Education Act.
Keywords
AI generated
Higher Education Act
false document
employment termination
university autonomy
cassation appeal
appointment basis
written declaration
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 95 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o szkolnictwie wyższym
Art. 3 ust. 1 i ust. 3 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 12 września 1990 r. o szkolnictwie wyższym
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 39312 k.p.c