I PKN 917/00
AI generated
Employee revoking salary payment consent does not violate loyalty obligation to employer.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of Marzena B.'s claim for damages regarding wrongful termination. The court found that while the employee had initially authorized bank transfers for her salary, she retained the right to revoke this consent at any time. Consequently, her subsequent refusal to allow further transfers did not constitute a breach of loyalty or cause for dismissal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 86 § 2, 3 k.p.; Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 100 § 2 pkt 5 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: An employee's right to revoke consent to non-cash salary payment does not violate the duty of loyalty to the employer.
Keywords
AI generated
duty of loyalty
salary payment consent
wrongful termination
employee rights
bank account transfer
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 86 § 2 k.p.
Art. 86 § 3 k.p.
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 § 2 pkt 5 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c