Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 917/00 AI generated

Employee revoking salary payment consent does not violate loyalty obligation to employer.

Case Number I PKN 917/00
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of Marzena B.'s claim for damages regarding wrongful termination. The court found that while the employee had initially authorized bank transfers for her salary, she retained the right to revoke this consent at any time. Consequently, her subsequent refusal to allow further transfers did not constitute a breach of loyalty or cause for dismissal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 86 § 2, 3 k.p.; Art. 45 § 1 k.p.; Art. 100 § 2 pkt 5 k.p.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: An employee's right to revoke consent to non-cash salary payment does not violate the duty of loyalty to the employer.

Keywords

AI generated
duty of loyalty salary payment consent wrongful termination employee rights bank account transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 86 § 2 k.p.
Art. 86 § 3 k.p.
Art. 45 § 1 k.p.
Art. 100 § 2 pkt 5 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3931 pkt 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text