Employee's actions aiding employer's bankruptcy and asset seizure violate duty of care, justifying dismissal.

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's appeal to reinstate his employment after the employer terminated him for supporting actions leading to bankruptcy. The court found that the employee, as a shareholder, voted to seize company assets and file for bankruptcy, violating his duty of care under Article 100 of the Labor Code. Although the employee's actions were legal and non-faulty, the court ruled that such conduct sufficiently justified dismissal as a normal resolution of the labor contract.