Criminal investigation initiation does not suspend labor dismissal proceedings if sole cause is interim management appointment.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a labor dismissal claim against a state enterprise director. The lower courts ruled that the director's removal was solely due to the appointment of an interim management board, not the criminal investigation initiated against the enterprise. The court held that since the dismissal decision was based exclusively on the interim management appointment, the subsequent criminal proceedings could not alter the legal basis for the dismissal, thus the procedural suspension was unnecessary.