Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 144/98 AI generated

Dismissal of dismissal due to lack of severance pay right when removal is linked to financial crisis.

Case Number I PKN 144/98
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for severance pay following the director's removal. The lower court had denied the claim because the removal was linked to the company's financial crisis and the establishment of a commissary administration. The Supreme Court ruled that the removal based solely on Article 66(2) without citing Article 65(1) does not deprive the director of the right to severance pay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 66 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych; Art. 39 ust. 1 tej ustawy: A director removed solely on the basis of Article 66(2) in connection with the establishment of a commissary administration is entitled to severance pay unless the removing authority explicitly cites Article 65(1) as the ground for removal.

Keywords

AI generated
state-owned enterprises director removal severance pay entitlement commissary administration financial crisis grounds administrative law labor dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 66 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
art. 39 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
art. 65 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 września 1981 r. o przedsiębiorstwach państwowych
art. 393 13 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text