Supreme Court dismisses cassation; termination timing depends on managing body, not authorized agent.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation against the Regional Court's decision to reject the employee's claim for damages. The employee argued that the one-month notice period expired incorrectly because the Board of Supervisors, rather than the President of the Board, issued the termination notice. The court held that the managing body acts as the employer and that the notice period begins only when the managing body receives the grounds for termination, regardless of any temporary authorization given to another organ. Consequently, the termination was deemed timely, and the procedural error alleged by the appellant was found non-existent.