Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 5/99 AI generated

Employer's early termination date in immediate dismissal notice does not violate labor law or justify employee claims.

Case Number III ZP 5/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question regarding whether an employer's early termination date in an immediate dismissal notice violates labor law. Both instances had previously awarded damages to the employee for the retroactive effect of the notice, but the Supreme Court clarified that such a date is not a material element of the employer's declaration of will. The court ruled that while the contract cannot terminate before the employee receives the notice, the employer may specify a future date, and the employee's remedy lies in correction or compensation for readiness, not in claims under Article 56 of the Labor Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 56 § 1 KP; Art. 61 KC w zw. z art. 300 KP; Wskazanie przez pracodawcę w oświadczeniu woli o rozwiązaniu bez wypowiedzenia wcześniejszego terminu niż złożenie oświadczenia nie stanowi naruszenia przepisów o rozwiązywaniu umów o pracę w rozumieniu art. 56 § 1 KP i nie uzasadnia roszczeń pracownika.

Keywords

AI generated
immediate dismissal retroactive effect labor code violation declaration of will termination date employee remedy contract termination

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 56 § 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 61 Kodeksu cywilnego w zw. z art. 300 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 18 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 49 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 81 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 97 § 21 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 99 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 30 § 5 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 265 Kodeksu pracy

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Uchwała SN z dnia 6 października 1998 r., III ZP 10/98

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text