Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 44/99 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling that using statute of limitations defense requires proof of abuse of rights under Civil Code.

Case Number II UKN 44/99
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court's decision to uphold a worker's compensation claim. The plaintiff sought damages for a work-related illness, while the employer argued the claim was time-barred. The court found the lower court failed to investigate whether the employer abused its rights by raising the defense, as the plaintiff did not prove exceptional circumstances warranting such an exception.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 5 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 227, 231, 232 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: The court must examine whether a debtor's use of the statute of limitations defense constitutes an abuse of rights contrary to social coexistence principles, requiring specific factual findings rather than mechanical application of precedent.

Keywords

AI generated
abuse of rights statute of limitations work-related illness civil code cassation appeal social coexistence employer liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 5 Kodeksu cywilnego
art. 227 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 231 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 232 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
art. 393 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text