Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PRN 3/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses dismissal of work accident compensation due to statute of limitations, citing public policy under Civil Code Art. 5.

Case Number II PRN 3/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside a lower court's dismissal of a work accident compensation claim based on the statute of limitations. The plaintiff argued that the three-year limitation period should not apply strictly because the accident occurred during employment and involved significant personal hardship. The court ruled that the special nature of work accident claims requires evaluating the statute of limitations through the lens of social coexistence principles, finding the lower court's failure to do so a grave violation of law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 5 k.c.; Art. 442 k.c.; Art. 417 k.p.c.; Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 40 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy; Even when a statute of limitations is invoked for work accident damages, the court must assess it considering social coexistence principles and the victim's life situation, as a strict application may constitute a grave violation of law.

Keywords

AI generated
work accident compensation statute of limitations social coexistence principles grave violation of law special nature of claims public policy assessment reversal of judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 5 k.c.
Art. 442 k.c.
Art. 417 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 40 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
art. 5 k.c
art. 442 k.c
art. 292 § 2 k.p
art. 417 k.p.c
art. 422 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text