Criminal appeal dismissed; material law violation claim rejected due to lack of procedural error and factual findings.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the regional court's decision to deny work accident compensation. The plaintiff argued that the lower courts incorrectly classified the relationship as a civil contract rather than an employment contract, violating material law. The court ruled that since the cassation did not allege any procedural errors by the second-instance court, the material law violation claim lacked justification. Consequently, the court upheld the factual findings that the relationship was civil in nature.