Supreme Court dismisses appeal confirming one employment contract per employer rule prevents dual contracts.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a doctor seeking to establish a separate employment contract for his shift work. The lower courts held that because a single doctor cannot hold two employment contracts with the same employer, all shifts were merely internal duty shifts under the primary contract. The Court ruled that Article 18 of the Labor Code does not permit the creation of a second contract even if it benefits the employee, as the law strictly prohibits dual employment relationships with one entity.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 18 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: An employee may maintain only one employment relationship with a single employer, rendering any claim to establish a second contract inadmissible regardless of the employee's benefit.