Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 285/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee missed 3-year appeal deadline despite no notice, losing termination validity.

Case Number I PKN 285/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against his dismissal. The lower courts rejected the claim because the employee failed to appeal the termination within the strict three-year statutory period, despite receiving no specific notice on how to appeal. The Court ruled that the employee's awareness of his termination through subsequent social security decisions precluded a claim of non-negligence for missing the deadline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 264 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania pracy; Art. 53 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania pracy: An employee cannot successfully claim non-negligence for missing the appeal deadline if the dismissal letter lacked appeal instructions, provided the delay is substantial and the employee was aware of the termination through other official means.

Keywords

AI generated
labor law appeal statutory deadline non-negligence dismissal validity social security notice cassation appeal employee awareness

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 264 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania pracy
Art. 53 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania pracy
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 393 § 12 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text