I PRN 104/95
AI generated
Court held that arriving at work and refusing specific tasks due to a valid union exemption is not abandonment of work.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court overturned a lower court's finding that the plaintiff abandoned his job by refusing specific tasks assigned by the employer. The plaintiff argued he was entitled to a full-time exemption from work duties under the Trade Union Act, which the employer allegedly violated. The court ruled that such refusal does not constitute abandonment when based on a genuine belief that the employer is breaching statutory rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 65 § 1 zdanie 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: Refusal to perform specific tasks assigned by the employer, when based on a genuine belief that the employer violates statutory rights, does not constitute abandonment of work.
Keywords
AI generated
abandonment of work
trade union exemption
specific task refusal
employee rights
labor law interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 65 § 1 zdanie 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
rozporządzenie z dnia 19 maja 1992 r. w sprawie udzielania bezpłatnych urlopów oraz zwolnień od pracy