Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 104/95 AI generated

Court held that arriving at work and refusing specific tasks due to a valid union exemption is not abandonment of work.

Case Number I PRN 104/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned a lower court's finding that the plaintiff abandoned his job by refusing specific tasks assigned by the employer. The plaintiff argued he was entitled to a full-time exemption from work duties under the Trade Union Act, which the employer allegedly violated. The court ruled that such refusal does not constitute abandonment when based on a genuine belief that the employer is breaching statutory rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 65 § 1 zdanie 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: Refusal to perform specific tasks assigned by the employer, when based on a genuine belief that the employer violates statutory rights, does not constitute abandonment of work.

Keywords

AI generated
abandonment of work trade union exemption specific task refusal employee rights labor law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 65 § 1 zdanie 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
rozporządzenie z dnia 19 maja 1992 r. w sprawie udzielania bezpłatnych urlopów oraz zwolnień od pracy

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text