Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 34/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal; fixed-term appointment of cultural director does not imply indefinite employment.

Case Number I PRN 34/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision appeal filed by a former cultural director seeking reinstatement to an indefinite-term position. The plaintiff argued that his participation in a board meeting after his fixed-term contract expired constituted an implied extension of his employment. The court held that the specific statute governing cultural institutions explicitly permits both fixed-term and indefinite-term appointments, and the plaintiff's attendance at a meeting did not demonstrate the employer's intent to renew the contract indefinitely.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 25 października 1991 r. o organizowaniu i prowadzeniu działalności kulturalnej, art. 15 ust. 3; Kodeks pracy, art. 68 § 11; Przepis ten dopuszcza powoływanie dyrektorów państwowych instytucji kultury na czas określony lub nieokreślony, a udział pracownika w naradzie po upływie okresu nie stanowi dowodu zamiaru przedłużenia stosunku pracy.

Keywords

AI generated
cultural director appointment fixed term contract implied renewal extraordinary revision labor law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 25 października 1991 r. o organizowaniu i prowadzeniu działalności kulturalnej, art. 15 ust. 3
Kodeks pracy, art. 68 § 11
Kodeks pracy, art. 30 § 1 pkt 4
Kodeks cywilny, art. 60
Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, art. 422 § 1
Kodeks pracy, art. 189
Kodeks pracy, art. 16 ust. 1
art. 3 k.p
art. 67 § 2 k.p.c
art. 69 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text