Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 8/94 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review; obvious error insufficient for gross violation of law under Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.

Case Number III ARN 8/94
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Minister of Justice's extraordinary review against the Supreme Administrative Court's decision to reject a building permit application. The applicant argued the lower court's ruling constituted a gross violation of law, while the administration contended the decision was based on equal treatment and procedural correctness. The court ruled that an obvious error alone does not meet the high threshold for a gross violation, as overturning the decision would unjustly privilege one party over another without a clear legal basis.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.; Even an obvious error in law is insufficient to constitute a gross violation requiring the setting aside of a judgment; only errors producing consequences unacceptable from the perspective of the rule of law qualify as gross violations.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review gross violation of law obvious error principle of equality rule of law administrative procedure building permit

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 417 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 5 ust. 1 pkt 6 Prawa budowlanego
§ 12 i 13 rozporządzenia Ministra Administracji, Gospodarki Terenowej i Ochrony środowiska z dnia 3 lipca 1980 r.
art. 417 § 1 k.p.c
art. 138 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I SA 367/83
IV SA 129/87
III ARN 18/91
III CRN 265/67
III CRN 314/87

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text