IV P 21/20
AI generated
Court dismissed plaintiff's claim for employment contract recognition and work certificate, ruling on contract nature.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's lawsuit seeking a work certificate and the recognition of an employment relationship. The plaintiff argued that his security work involved subordination and fixed hours, but the court found no binding employment control. Consequently, the court determined the agreements were mixed civil and labor contracts based on the parties' explicit intent.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 22 k.p.; Art. 102 k.p.c.; Art. 113 ust. 1 u.k.s.c.: Where a contract exhibits features of both employment and civil agreements, the court must determine the nature based on the parties' expressed will and the absence of definitive subordination.
Keywords
AI generated
employment contract recognition
mixed civil labor contract
work certificate issuance
subordination test
labor law dispute
contract nature determination
security services
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 22 k.p.
art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 113 ust. 1 u.k.s.c.
art. 22 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 102 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PKN 191/98
Supreme Court dismisses labor claim where parties knowingly chose contract for work avoidance without intent to evade law.
I PKN 432/99
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling Art. 22 § 11 KP does not create a legal presumption of employment contracts.
II PK 82/10
Supreme Court dismissed appeal confirming employment contract features were absent in security service agreements.
I UK 446/15
Court dismissed appeal on social insurance coverage for security guards under contract for work results.
II PK 161/13
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on labor dispute for lack of significant legal issue requiring interpretation.
I ACa 1165/13
Appeal dismissed; fixed compensation deemed appropriate for health disturbance without new disease caused by prison medical negligence.
II UK 517/15
Wyrokiem z dnia 18 lutego 2015 r., III AUa (...), Sąd Apelacyjny oddalił apelację wnioskodawcy A.
Related Decisions
AI generatedX P 275/14
Powód R. M. w pozwie skierowanym przeciwko (...) spółka z o.o. w P., a także w piśmie procesowym z dnia 24 marca 2014 r. wniósł pozew o ustalenie że łączył go z pozwanym stosunek pracy w okresie od 21 stycznia 2014 r. do 31 marca 2014 r. na stanowisku pracownika terenu zewnętrznego, porządkowy w niepełnym wymiarze czasu pracy tj. na ½ etatu na czas określony.
VI P 564/16
Pozwem z dnia 24 października 2016 roku (data prezentaty) powód W.
VII Pa 18/17
Zaskarżonym wyrokiem z dnia 18.11.2016r.
IX P 574/17
Labor court dismissed plaintiff's claim for employment relationship and related benefits due to civil contract nature.
IV P 23/21
Court recognizes employment relationship and awards overtime, leave, and laundry allowances while dismissing remaining claims.