Supreme Court dismisses labor claim where parties knowingly chose contract for work avoidance without intent to evade law.

The Supreme Court dismissed Felix M.'s appeal seeking to reclassify eighteen consecutive service contracts as employment contracts. The court found that Felix M. knowingly signed these contracts without objections, while the Agency employed him under service agreements to avoid labor law obligations. Consequently, the court ruled that the parties' mutual intent and the contract's purpose, rather than its name, determined its legal nature, rejecting the claim of legal avoidance.