IV P 658/18
AI generated
Court partially allowed training cost recovery, reducing loan by service duration ratio per Labor Code.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court ordered the employer to pay 12,090 zł for the employee's vocational training, while dismissing the remaining claim. The plaintiff argued that a 4,508 zł loan was merely a disguised training subsidy, but the court found the loan distinct and subject to proportional reduction. Consequently, the court calculated the recoverable amount by prorating the total training cost based on the six months the employee actually worked for the plaintiff out of the required three years.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 103 § 3, 5 k.p.; When an employer provides a loan to cover training costs, early termination of the employment contract requires proportional reduction of the loan amount based on the duration of actual service rendered.
Keywords
AI generated
vocational training costs
employment contract termination
loan repayment reduction
Labor Code provisions
proportional liability
disguised training subsidy
service duration calculation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 103 § 3 k.p.
Art. 103 § 5 k.p.
Art. 481 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 100 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
art. 36 § 1 pkt 3 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 58 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedI C 1031/19
Court partially allowed employer's claim for training costs and efficiency losses against employee under contract freedom.
III APa 1/21
Appeal dismissed; employer must return full training costs as contract termination was not due to employee's fault.
VI P 119/21
Court orders employee to repay training costs for early resignation, upholding employer's contractual right to reimbursement.
IX P 650/17
Court dismissed claim for training costs as penalty clause invalid under Labor Code and no actual costs incurred.