Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 257/09 AI generated

Free leave period does not count as worked time if civil contracts continue employment duties.

Case Number II PK 257/09
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Ministry of Finance's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that denied the employee's obligation to repay training costs. The employee had taken unpaid leave while simultaneously performing legal duties under civil law contracts for the employer. The court held that this arrangement constituted a sham leave because the employee continued to work using acquired qualifications, thereby fulfilling the required service period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 174 § 1 k.p.; The period of unpaid leave cannot be considered as worked time if the employee continues to perform duties for the employer under civil law contracts, as this demonstrates a lack of genuine suspension of work obligations.

Keywords

AI generated
unpaid leave civil law contracts sham employment training costs service period labor law employer liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 174 § 1 k.p.
art. 174 § 1 k.p
art. 174 k.p
art. 65 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 174 § 2 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text