Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep III DoR 77/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2025:III.DOR.77.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses review application in small value commercial dispute as review is legally excluded.

Case Number VSRS Sklep III DoR 77/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court rejected the defendant's application for review, upholding the lower courts' judgment ordering payment of 339.45 EUR and legal costs. The defendant argued for a review, but the court determined the case involved a small-value commercial dispute under 4,000 EUR. Since the Civil Procedure Act explicitly excludes review in such cases, the application was inadmissible and dismissed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

8th paragraph of Article 458 of the Civil Procedure Act; 2nd paragraph of Article 367 of the Civil Procedure Act: In small-value commercial disputes, review is legally excluded and cannot be admitted.

Keywords

AI generated
small value commercial dispute review inadmissibility Civil Procedure Act supreme court review legal exclusion of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 458, paragraph 8 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 495, paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 377 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 324, paragraph 7 of the Civil Procedure Act

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II DoR 130/2021
Supreme Court dismisses appeal application for review in small value civil disputes as review is not permitted by law.
II DoR 253/2021
Supreme Court dismisses review request in small value civil dispute as review is statutorily prohibited.
II DoR 636/2020
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request in small value dispute as revision is legally excluded by law.
II DoR 681/2019
Appeal in small-value disputes is inadmissible; court rejects request for review permission under ZPP.
II DoR 318/2019
Appeal against small claim damages judgment dismissed as review barred by law for minor value disputes.
II DoR 85/2019
Supreme Court dismisses appeal request in small value debt dispute where revision is statutorily prohibited.
AI generated
VDSS sodba in sklep Pdp 57/2011
Appeal partially allowed; court ruled on partial payment order and procedural error in cost allocation.
VSL Sodba II Cpg 462/2020
Appeal dismissed; VAT declaration required at lease start; service proof burden on recipient.
Sodba III Ips 86/2011
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal on service of process and jurisdiction under lex fori.
VSL sklep I Cpg 1333/2015
Appeal granted; first instance court failed to address contributory negligence claim violating ZPP procedural rules.
VSL sodba II Cp 100/99
Court dismisses claim for damages due to untimely filing, applying the statute of limitations rule. Plaintiff failed to discover the full scope of non-material damage until 1995.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Po osmem odstavku 458. člena ZPP v sporih majhne vrednosti revizije ni. Če zakon določa, da revizije ni, je ni mogoče niti dopustiti (drugi odstavek 367. člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo plačilo 339,45 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 19. 1. 2024 dalje v roku 8 dni (I. točka izreka) ter ji naložilo plačilo pravdnih stroškov tožeče stranke (II. točka izreka).

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo izpodbijano sodbo sodišča prve stopnje (I. točka izreka) ter ji naložilo plačilo pritožbenih stroškov tožeče stranke (II. točka izreka).

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje vlaga tožena stranka predlog za dopustitev revizije.

4. Predlog ni dovoljen.

5. Po določbi prvega odstavka 495. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) so v gospodarskih sporih spori majhne vrednosti spori, v katerih se tožbeni zahtevek nanaša na denarno terjatev, ki ne presega 4.000,00 EUR. V konkretni zadevi se tožbeni zahtevek nanaša na denarno terjatev v višini 339,45 EUR. Brez dvoma gre za spor majhne vrednosti, postopek pa se je kot takšen vodil tudi pred sodiščema prve in druge stopnje.

6. Po osmem odstavku 458. člena ZPP v sporih majhne vrednosti revizije ni. 1 Če zakon določa, da revizije ni, je ni mogoče niti dopustiti (drugi odstavek 367. člena ZPP). Predlog za njeno dopustitev zato v konkretnem primeru ni dovoljen in ga je Vrhovno sodišče zavrglo (377. člen ZPP). 2

7. Sklep je bil sprejet soglasno (sedmi odstavek 324. člena ZPP).

1 Ta določba je v zakonu ostala tudi po uveljavitvi Zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP-E; Uradni list RS, št. 10/17), ki je sicer opustila ureditev dovoljenosti revizije po vrednostnem kriteriju.

2 Sklepi Vrhovnega sodišča II DoR 130/2021 z dne 2. 6. 2021, II DoR 253/2021 z dne 2. 6. 2021, II DoR 636/2020 z dne 3. 3. 2021, II DoR 681/2019 z dne 6. 2. 2020, II DoR 318/2019 z dne 25. 7. 2019 in II DoR 85/2019 z dne 15. 4. 2019.