Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSL Sklep I Cp 187/2022 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2022:I.CP.187.2022 AI generated

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; plaintiff withdrew appeal before court ruling, bearing own costs.

Case Number VSL Sklep I Cp 187/2022
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court ruled that the plaintiff's appeal was withdrawn before a decision could be made. The plaintiff had lodged a timely appeal against a first-instance cost ruling but subsequently withdrew it via a separate application. Since the withdrawal occurred prior to the appellate court's deliberation, the court merely confirmed the withdrawal and assigned the costs to the withdrawing party.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP; drugi odstavek 158. člena ZPP: An appeal withdrawn before the appellate court renders a decision is validly withdrawn, and the withdrawing party bears the costs if the parties agreed on cost sharing.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal costs allocation appellate procedure ZPP withdrawal plaintiff bears costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP
Ker je tožnica pritožbo umaknila preden je pritožbeno sodišče o njej odločilo, je umik dopusten (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP).
drugi odstavek 158. člena ZPP

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VSL sklepi II Cp 2089/2020
2 VSL sklepi II Cp 2089/2020, I Cp 196/2018, I Cp 100/2017 in drugi.
I Cp 196/2018
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal request as withdrawal is permitted under ZPP 334(2) before final judgment.
I Cp 100/2017
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal request as procedural outcome requires formal court finding of withdrawal.
AI generated
VSL sodba III Cp 2457/2016
Appeal dismissed; insurer properly paid claimant's wife based on apparent authority and lack of duty to verify identity.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1943/2022
Appeal allowed; appellate court quashes first instance judgment for procedural violation and remands case.
VDSS Sodba Pdp 294/2025
Appeal dismissed; interest start date determined by debt demand, not lawsuit filing for pure monetary claims.
VSL sklep II Cpg 1234/2016
Appeal allowed; first-instance court erred by rejecting timely amendment of complaint filed by counsel.
VSC Sklep I Cp 151/2022
Appeal dismissed; costs awarded to plaintiff as defendant lost main case and failed to contest costs. Defendant must pay 186.66 EUR. Court upheld first instance ruling. Defendant must pay 186.66 EUR.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

I. Ugotovi se, da je pritožba umaknjena.

II. Tožeča stranka nosi svoje pritožbene stroške.

[JEDRO]

Ker je tožnica pritožbo umaknila preden je pritožbeno sodišče o njej odločilo, je umik dopusten (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP). Zato se s tem sklepom zgolj ugotovi umik pritožbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. V obravnavani zadevi je sodišče prve stopnje dne 26. 11. 2021 izdalo sklep, s katerim je odločilo o stroških postopka na prvi stopnji.

2. Tožnica je zoper sklep sodišča prve stopnje vložila pravočasno pritožbo, katero je z vlogo z dne 11. 2. 2022 umaknila.

3. Ker je tožnica pritožbo umaknila preden je pritožbeno sodišče o njej odločilo, je umik dopusten (drugi odstavek 334. člena ZPP). Zato se s tem sklepom zgolj ugotovi umik pritožbe. 2

4. Skladno z drugim odstavkom 158. člena ZPP in ker sta se pravdni stranki s poravnavo dogovorili, da vsaka nosi svoje stroške, tožnica nosi svoje pritožbene stroške, tožencu pa pritožbeni stroški niso nastali, saj ni podal odgovora na pritožbo.

2 VSL sklepi II Cp 2089/2020, I Cp 196/2018, I Cp 100/2017 in drugi.