Withdrawal of Appeal and Extinguishment of Instance
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn appellant filed an appeal on August 2, 2011, against a decision rendered by the labor relations council on July 7, 2011; however, the appellant subsequently submitted a letter dated August 11, 2011, formally withdrawing the appeal. Given the appellant's unilateral withdrawal of the appeal and the absence of any cross-appeal from the appellee, the presiding magistrate recorded the withdrawal, declared the instance extinguished, divested the court of its jurisdiction, and ordered the appellant to pay the costs, subject to any agreement between the parties.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAarticle 396 du code de procédure civile, article 397 du code de procédure civile, article 399 du code de procédure civile, article 400 du code de procédure civile, article 401 du code de procédure civile, article 403 du code de procédure civile; Withdrawal of Appeal and Extinguishment of Instance: Given the appellant's unilateral withdrawal of the appeal and the absence of any cross-appeal from the appellee, the presiding magistrate recorded the withdrawal, declared the instance extinguished, divested the court of its jurisdiction, and ordered the appellant to pay the costs, subject to any agreement between the parties.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article provides the legal basis for noting the withdrawal of the instance (désistement d'instance).
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case, which led to the ruling on the withdrawal.
This article is cited as a general procedural basis for the instruction of the case by the instructing magistrate.
Texte complet
COUR D'APPEL
D'ANGERS
Chambre Sociale
RG N : 11/01985
Affaire : Jugement Au fond, origine Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire d'ANGERS, décision attaquée en date du 07 Juillet 2011, enregistrée sous le no F 10/00697
ORDONNANCE N 461/11
Mademoiselle Anita X...
...
49000 ANGERS
Représentant : M. Y... (Délégué syndical ouvrier)
APPELANT
Mademoiselle Jocelyne Z...
...
49240 AVRILLE
INTIME
ORDONNANCE DU MAGISTRAT CHARGE D'INSTRUIRE L'AFFAIRE
Nous, Brigitte ARNAUD-PETIT, magistrat chargé d'instruire l'affaire,
Vu les dispositions des articles 396, 397, 399, 400, 401, 403, 405 et 945 du code de procédure civile,
Vu l'appel en date du 02 août 2011, interjeté par Mademoiselle Anita X... à l'encontre du jugement prononcé par le conseil de prud'hommes d'ANGERS en date du 07 juillet 2011,
Vu le courrier reçu au greffe de la cour d'appel, le 11 août 2011, par lequel Mademoiselle Anita X... indique se désister de l'instance d'appel,
Vu l'absence d'appel incident de Mademoiselle Jocelyne Z...,
PAR CES MOTIFS,
Donnons acte à Mademoiselle Anita X... de son désistement.
Constatons l'extinction de l'instance et le dessaisissement de la cour et condamnons Mademoiselle Anita X... aux dépens, sous réserve d'un éventuel accord des parties.
Fait à ANGERS le 30 Août 2011
Le magistrat chargé d'instruire l'affaire,