Voluntary Homicide Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unsigned Grounds Brief
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn individual charged with voluntary homicide appealed a decision by the Court of Appeal upholding the indictment judge's rejection of their request for release, but the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the accompanying personal brief, which was required to state the grounds for cassation, was unsigned and thus failed to meet the requirements of the relevant procedural code, resulting in the appellant being deemed to have forfeited their appeal for failing to file a receivable statement of grounds within the required one-month period following the declaration of the appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 567-2 ALINEA 2, ARTICLE 567-2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Voluntary Homicide Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unsigned Grounds Brief: An individual charged with voluntary homicide appealed a decision by the Court of Appeal upholding the indictment judge's rejection of their request for release, but the Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because the accompanying personal brief, which was required to state the grounds for cassation, was unsigned and thus failed to meet the requirements of the relevant procedural code, resulting in the appellant being deemed to have forfeited their appeal for failing to file a receivable statement of grounds within the required one-month period following the declaration of the appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe applicant was declared barred (dechu) from appealing due to the failure to submit a receivable brief explaining the grounds for cassation within the required timeframe.
This article was cited as the basis for applying the procedural sanction regarding the appeal.
Texte complet
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - X... GERARD, INCULPE D'HOMICIDE VOLONTAIRE, CONTRE UN ARRET RENDU LE 4 MAI 1983 PAR LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE NIMES QUI A CONFIRME L'ORDONNANCE DU JUGE D'INSTRUCTION REJETANT SA DEMANDE DE MISE EN LIBERTE ;
VU L'ARTICLE 567-2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT ;
ATTENDU QUE LE MEMOIRE QUI N'EST PAS SIGNE PAR LE DEMANDEUR NE REMPLIT PAS LES CONDITIONS EXIGEES PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET NE SAISIT PAS LA COUR DE CASSATION DES MOYENS QU'IL POURRAIT CONTENIR ;
QU'IL S'ENSUIT QUE X... QUI S'EST REGULIEREMENT POURVU LE 11 MAI 1983 CONTRE UN ARRET RENDU EN MATIERE DE DETENTION PROVISOIRE N'A PAS DEPOSE DANS LE DELAI D'UN MOIS A COMPTER DE LA DECLARATION DU POURVOI, CE MEMOIRE RECEVABLE EXPOSANT SES MOYENS DE CASSATION ;
QU'IL Y A LIEU EN CONSEQUENCE DE LE DECLARER DECHU DE SON POURVOI EN APPLICATION DES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ALINEA 2 DE L'ARTICLE 567-2 SUSVISE ;
DECLARE LE DEMANDEUR DECHU DE SON POURVOI ;
LE CONDAMNE AUX DEPENS ;