Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000007522449 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Pre-Trial Release for Aggravated Battery

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000007522449
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An accused individual, facing charges of aggravated battery (battery with a weapon), appealed a decision by the indictment chamber that upheld the investigating judge's refusal to grant release pending trial. The indictment chamber confirmed the detention based on the gravity of the alleged assault and the defendant's criminal record, concluding that these factors demonstrated the individual's dangerousness and justified continued provisional detention to prevent reoffending. The high court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the grounds cited by the lower court—specifically referencing the danger posed by the accused—were sufficiently explicit to allow review and confirmed that the refusal to release was based on one of the narrowly defined legal justifications for detention, thereby satisfying procedural requirements.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE, ARTICLE 144, ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Regarding Denial of Pre-Trial Release for Aggravated Battery: The indictment chamber confirmed the detention based on the gravity of the alleged assault and the defendant's criminal record, concluding that these factors demonstrated the individual's dangerousness and justified continued provisional detention to prevent reoffending. The high court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the grounds cited by the lower court—specifically referencing the danger posed by the accused—were sufficiently explicit to allow review and confirmed that the refusal to release was based on one of the narrowly defined legal justifications for detention, thereby satisfying procedural requirements.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
détention provisoire ordonnance de renvoi cas grave mise en liberté provisoire motifs valables condition de recevabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The court confirmed that the refusal to release the applicant was issued under the conditions required by this article.
ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE
The court confirmed that the decision refusing release was specially motivated as required by this article.
ARTICLE 144
The court confirmed that the refusal was based on one of the limited grounds enumerated in this article.
ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This article was cited in the ground for cassation that was ultimately rejected.
Généré par l'IA
00-80725
Appeal Against Refusal of Pre-Trial Release in Aggravated Violence Case
89-86718
Appeal Against Refusal of Pre-Trial Release in Aggravated Theft Case
95-84796
Denial of Pre-Trial Release Appeal in Attempted Robbery Case
96-82366
Appeal Against Denial of Pre-Trial Release in Aggravated Theft Case
96-83069
Appeal Regarding Pre-Trial Detention Denial Rejected on Procedural Grounds

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The court confirmed that the refusal to release the applicant was issued under the conditions required by this article.

ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE

The court confirmed that the decision refusing release was specially motivated as required by this article.

ARTICLE 144

The court confirmed that the refusal was based on one of the limited grounds enumerated in this article.

ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This article was cited in the ground for cassation that was ultimately rejected.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR : - Y... JEAN-JACQUES - CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE SAINT-DENIS DE LA REUNION, EN DATE DU 12 JANVIER 1983, QUI, DANS LA PROCEDURE SUIVIE CONTRE LUI DU CHEF DE COUPS ET BLESSURES AVEC ARMES, A CONFIRME L'ORDONNANCE DU JUGE D'INSTRUCTION REJETANT SA DEMANDE DE MISE EN LIBERTE ;

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL, SIGNE PAR LE DEMANDEUR ;

SUR LE MOYEN DE CASSATION PROPOSE ET PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DE L'ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET DES DROITS DE LA DEFENSE ;

ATTENDU QUE, POUR CONFIRMER L'ORDONNANCE ENTREPRISE, LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION, APRES AVOIR PRECISE QUE JEAN-JACQUES Y... EST POURSUIVI POUR AVOIR PORTE DES COUPS ET BLESSURES VOLONTAIRES AVEC ARME SUR LA PERSONNE DE SERGE X..., ENONCE QUE LES ANTECEDENTS JUDICIAIRES DE L'INCULPE, AINSI QUE LA GRAVITE DE L'AGRESSION QUI LUI EST REPROCHEE, MANIFESTENT AVEC EVIDENCE LA DANGEROSITE DE SA PERSONNALITE ET QU'IL Y A LIEU DE MAINTENIR LA DETENTION PROVISOIRE POUR EVITER LE RISQUE DE RENOUVELLEMENT DE L'INFRACTION ;

ATTENDU QUE DE TELLES ENONCIATIONS METTENT LA COUR DE CASSATION EN MESURE DE S'ASSURER QUE LE REFUS DE MISE EN LIBERTE DU DEMANDEUR A ETE PRONONCE DANS LES CONDITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 148 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, PAR UNE DECISION SPECIALEMENT MOTIVEE TELLE QUE L'EXIGE L'ARTICLE 145 DU MEME CODE, ET POUR UN DE CAS LIMITATIVEMENT ENUMERES A SON ARTICLE 144 ;

QU'AINSI LE MOYEN PROPOSE DOIT ETRE ECARTE ;

ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;

REJETTE LE POURVOI ;